Eight of Nine U.S. Companies Agree to Work with EPA on Hydraulic Fracturing Study

Nov. 11, 2010
Agency subpoenaed Halliburton after if did not provide requested information

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced that eight out of the nine hydraulic fracturing companies that received voluntary information requests in September have agreed to submit timely and complete information to help the agency conduct its study on hydraulic fracturing. However, the ninth company, Halliburton, has failed to provide EPA the information necessary to move forward with the study. As a result, and as part of the agency’s effort to move forward as quickly as possible, EPA issued a subpoena to the company requiring submission of the requested information that has yet to be provided.

EPA’s congressionally mandated hydraulic fracturing study will look at the potential adverse impact of the practice on drinking water and public health. The agency is under a tight deadline to provide initial results by the end of 2012 and the thoroughness of the study depends on timely access to detailed information about the methods used for fracturing. EPA announced in March that it would conduct this study and solicit input from the public through a series of public meetings in major oil and gas production regions.

On Sept. 9, EPA reached out to nine leading national and regional hydraulic fracturing service providers–BJ Services, Complete Production Services, Halliburton, Key Energy Services, Patterson-UTI, RPC Inc., Schlumberger, Superior Well Services and Weatherford–seeking information on the chemical composition of fluids used in the hydraulic fracturing process, data on the impacts of the chemicals on human health and the environment, standard operating procedures at their hydraulic fracturing sites and the locations of sites where fracturing has been conducted.

Except for Halliburton, the companies have either fully complied with the Sept. 9 request or made unconditional commitments to provide all the information on an expeditious schedule.

Source: U.S. EPA