Dartmouth Study Finds that Arsenic Inhibits DNA Repair

June 5, 2006

Dartmouth researchers, working with scientists at the University of Arizona and at the Department of Natural Resources in Sonora, Mexico, have published a study on the impact of arsenic exposure on DNA damage. They have determined that arsenic in drinking water is associated with a decrease in the body’s ability to repair its DNA.

“This work supports the idea that arsenic in drinking water can promote the carcinogenic effects of other chemicals,” said Angeline Andrew, the lead author and a research assistant professor of community and family medicine at Dartmouth Medical School. “This is evidence that it’s more important than ever to keep arsenic out of drinking water.”

The study, which was published online on May 10, 2006 in the journal Environmental Health Perspectives, examined the drinking water and measured the arsenic levels in samples of urine and toenails of people who were enrolled in epidemiologic studies in New Hampshire and in Sonora, Mexico. Andrew and her colleagues examined the data in conjunction with tissue samples from the study participants to determine the effect of arsenic on DNA repair. To further corroborate their findings, the researchers conducted laboratory studies to examine the effects of arsenic on DNA repair in cultured human cell models.

“The DNA repair machinery normally protects us from DNA-damaging agents, such as those found in cigarette smoke,” Andrew said. “The concern is that exposure to drinking water arsenic may exacerbate the harmful effects of smoking or other exposures.”

Andrew explained that in regions of the U.S. where the rock contains higher levels of arsenic, there is a greater likelihood that drinking water sources contain some potential adverse levels of the toxin. While the levels of arsenic in municipal water systems are regularly monitored, there is no mandated testing of arsenic levels in private wells. This is of particular concern since the regions where arsenic levels are high are in rural regions, such as New Hampshire, Maine, Michigan and some regions of the Southwest and Rockies. Private wells are common in these areas as primary sources of drinking water.

Andrew’s co-authors on this paper are: Jefferey Burgess, Maria Meza, Eugene Demidenko, Mary Waugh, Joshua Hamilton and Margaret Karagas, all from Dartmouth Medical School, the Department of Environmental and Community Health at the University of Arizona or the Department of Natural Resources at the Technological Institute of Sonora, Mexico.

The research was supported by funding from the National Institutes of Health, the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, the National Cancer Institute, the Dartmouth and Arizona Superfund Programs and the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

Source: Dartmouth Medical School

Sponsored Recommendations

2024 Manufacturing Trends Unpacking AI, Workforce, and Cybersecurity

April 25, 2024
The world of manufacturing is changing, and Generative AI is one of the many change agents. The 2024 State of Smart Manufacturing Report takes a deep dive into how Generative ...

State of Smart Manufacturing Report Series

April 25, 2024
The world of manufacturing is changing, and Generative AI is one of the many change agents. The 2024 State of Smart Manufacturing Report takes a deep dive into how Generative ...

ArmorBlock 5000: Boost Automation Efficiency

April 25, 2024
Discover the transformative benefits of leveraging a scalable On-Machine I/O to improve flexibility, enhance reliability and streamline operations.

Blower Package Integration

March 20, 2024
See how an integrated blower package can save you time, money, and energy, in a wastewater treatment system. With package integration, you have a completely integrated blower ...