Water Treatment Plant Boosts Polymer Performance with Three-Stage Mixing Regimen

April 3, 2018
Reduced polymer consumption and less maintenance from new polymer feed system have proven to be a cost-effective solution for the facility’s chemical feed needs

ProMinent offers many solutions for municipalities in need of water and wastewater treatment. Visit booth 2215 at the ACE conference—June 7 to 10 in Anaheim, Calif.—to learn more about ProMinent's full line of products for municipalities. Mention this case study at ProMinent's booth and receive a free gift.

The City of Mankato, Minn., Water Treatment Plant staff elected to install a new polymer blending and mixing system that provides efficient polymer activation through a three-stage mixing system. The existing polymer system had poor mixing and inadequate activation, as well as a number of maintenance issues that cost the city time and money.

For 18 months, the new polymer system treated one softening reactor while the older system continued to treat the other reactor. This provided plant management the opportunity to observe first-hand the advantages of programmed three-stage mixing under normal day-to-day operating conditions.

During the initial 18 months operating the new system, the plant witnessed a significant reduction in polymer use, equating to smaller polymer doses, while also achieving improved settling of solids in the plant’s softening reactor, especially at higher flows.

System Overview

Mankato, which has a population of approximately 40,000, receives raw water from two surface wells and two deep wells. The water treatment plant, which is operated continuously, has a rated capacity of 12 mgd and average production of 5.5 mgd. Water enters the plant from the well field through a 24-in. line to two softening reactors. Following hardness removal, the water enters a re-carbonation basin before it is directed through ultra-filtration membranes. After filtration, chlorine and fluoride are added before the finished water flows into reservoirs and is then pumped into the city’s distribution system.

The plant’s two softening reactors provide three-stage lime softening—including rapid mix, gentle mix and clarification—all carried out in a single tank separated by baffles. Emulsion polymer is used as a flocculation aid and is added simultaneously with the lime and raw water as it enters the plant.

Existing Polymer System

The older, existing polymer preparation systems consisted of three in-line polymer mix/feed units—two on duty and one for backup. From the beginning, operators struggled to consistently make proper polymer solutions with this system.

The single-stage unit had been initially set up so that a diaphragm-metering pump would pull the emulsion polymer directly from a 55-gal drum. However, the pump serving it was not large enough to deliver the sufficient suction lift necessary to pull the product out of the drum and into the pump.

As a workaround, the plant installed three 15-gal day tanks positioned hydraulically above three pumps, relying on the raised height to provide the needed flooded suction. Using this setup, the plant pumped emulsion polymer out of the 55-gal supply drum into the three day tanks.

With this modification, there continued to be problems and inefficiencies with the system. Although the 55-gal drum has mixing capability, the day tanks do not, so the polymer was susceptible to separation. The day tanks were covered but not sealed, so moisture intrusion was a potential problem that could cause further inefficiencies if the polymer coagulated. Coagulated polymer (poly with moisture) tends to plug the chemical feed pumps, requiring disassembly and cleaning of the pumps.

The modification allowed for the existing blending and feed system to achieve the pounds of polymer required at lower plant flows. However, consistent performance remained problematic at higher flows.

In addition, the system was maintenance-intensive, including frequent ejector replacement at $300 for each failure. The mixing units had problems with plugging, and pump parts require frequent replacement. Maintenance personnel had to perform a complete takedown of the system every month, including the mixing units and pumps (ball valve and check valve replacement), pump recalibration and day tank cleanout. The plant spent more than $1,500 each year on parts for the existing system, and more than $2,000 in estimated staff labor to maintain it.

Pilot Testing

In 2012, plant management decided to run a trial on the ProMinent ProMix-S polymer blending and delivery system. The system was set up so that the unit feeds polymer solution to one of the plant’s softening reactors while the existing polymer system serves the other softener/clarifier.

The reduction in polymer consumption with the ProMix unit compared to the plant’s existing system proved significant during the performance trial. Its robust operation and ease of use was also apparent. Based on the highly positive performance results during the trial, Mankato elected to purchase the unit and continue evaluating the plant’s polymer usage and associated system performance.

The ProMix-S system is designed with three specific zones of polymer activation; the plant’s older unit had only a single zone. The first polymer activation zone provides high mixing energy to achieve the successful initial wetting of the polymer to prevent fisheye formation. The second zone provides medium mixing energy to provide optimum mixing without damaging the expanding polymer chains that have been activated and are very fragile at this stage. The third zone reduces the mixing energy even further, providing very gentle mixing to ensure that the polymer solution becomes fully homogeneous. The three-zone activation system also provides for slightly longer retention time prior to use.

The ProMix-S provides an LCD display (including primary and secondary flow display) with touchpad control. It has remote start/stop and programmable auto-flush.

The new system serving the water plant provides a 4-20-mA input to pace the pump and provide connections for Ethernet communications and data logging. The unit is connected to the plant’s SCADA system, and polymer dosing changes with the plant’s flow.

Lower Polymer Use, Better Solids Settling

The new system reduced polymer usage by 20% during head-to-head pilot testing. The clarifier also achieved better settling of solids in the softening reactor that is being served by the new unit; this had always been problematic with the older unit at higher flows. Based on the results of the trial, Mankato estimated an approximate 14-month payback on the purchase of the new system based on parts, labor and polymer savings.

When a softener was taken out of service, the staff would switch over to the new polymer system to serve whichever reactor was operating. In the summer, the plant typically runs both softeners; in the winter, however, sometimes only one reactor is run at a time, and polymer is directed there from the new blending and delivery unit. The new polymer unit has not been taken out of service since it was pilot tested.

The system required very little adjustment and remained well calibrated. The plant has not yet had to change out the pump’s peristaltic hose or the neat seat; the check valve into the mixer has not been changed out since July 2012.

After 18 months of use of the new system, the plant has purchased two additional ProMix-S units due to the high efficiency gained and the quick return on investment. The two new polymer systems will further decrease maintenance issues and reduce polymer usage while helping with operations and management of the facility. Overall, the system has proven to be a reliable and cost effective polymer feed solution.

Jim Jones is the water treatment superintendent of the City of Mankato, Minn. Jones can be contacted at [email protected].

About the Author

Jim Jones

Sponsored Recommendations

Energy Efficient System Design for WWTPs

Feb. 7, 2024
System splitting with adaptive control reduces electrical, maintenance, and initial investment costs.

Blower Isentropic Efficiency Explained

Feb. 7, 2024
Learn more about isentropic efficiency and specific performance as they relate to blowers.

How to Build a Better Blower Station

Feb. 7, 2024
Designing a blower aeration system for a wastewater treatment plant has many moving pieces. Each contributes to the overall health and efficiency of the system and the impact ...

Understanding Current Blower Technology & Isentropic Efficiency in Blowers

Feb. 7, 2024
Blowers are a critical resource for wastewater treatment plants, which makes choosing the best blower vital for plant operational success. No plant is stagnant, so a one size ...