Tassal Tasmanian Salmon, an Australian salmon farming company, backed away from plans to dump treated wastewater from salmon pens into...
City leaders question whether continued progress requires amending act or changing way EPA implements it
To mark the 40th anniversary of the Clean Water Act (CWA), a landmark federal law protecting water resources in the United States, the U.S. Conference of Mayors (USCM) hosted a panel discussion on Thursday, May 31, about the urgent need for regulatory reform as aggressive unfunded water mandates are guided by outdated regulatory approaches and collide with the ability of cities and their rate payers to pay for them. During the discussion, mayors called on Congress to either amend the act or ask the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to change the way it implements the act to meet a more current, cost-efficient and smart approach.
"Protecting our nation's water resources has always been a priority and success for mayors, but cities are almost single-handedly shouldering the monumental financial burden placed by unfunded water mandates, as they are already struggling with increased long-term debt and shrinking municipal funds," said Tom Cochran, USCM CEO & executive director. "Serious changes must be made to decrease the excessive costs being passed down to taxpayers through enormous rate hikes, hitting our citizens where it hurts the most."
Currently, the third most costly municipal expenditure for cities is providing safe and adequate water and wastewater infrastructure. Additionally, inflation, population growth and an aging infrastructure base continue to increase the needed investment each year. Yet, even with these pre-existing costs, EPA continues to pursue an aggressive program of advancing new water regulations and enforcement actions that expand a city's responsibility, but offer only marginal environmental or health benefits.
Despite struggling with severe budget cuts, local government, more than any other level of government, continues to invest public resources in ever growing amounts to clean water goals: $50 billion in 1995 to more than $103 billion in 2009; a total of $1.6 trillion from 1956 to 2008. Meanwhile, the federal government provides less than $2 billion per year to the states who provide loans, not grants, to local government. Estimates of needed investments over the next 20 years are staggering and are often in the trillions of dollars.
At USCM's urging, the EPA unveiled in October 2011 a new Integrated Planning and Permitting Policy (IP3) that is intended to provide a framework for sewer overflows and storm water management allowing federal, state and municipal governments to collaborate more effectively.
However, cities continue to be frustrated by the way in which the EPA, and especially EPA's regional offices, is implementing the CWA and contend that the agency's overall expectations that local government continually increase investments to comply with clean water rules is unrealistic and ignores the reality of limited public finances.
Below is the list of mayors who participated in the panel:
Hallandale Beach, Fla., Mayor Joy Cooper—chair, USCM Environment Committee
Chicopee, Mass., Mayor Michael Bissonnette—vice-chair, USCM Environment Committee
Chattanooga, Tenn., Mayor Ron Littlefield
Lima, Ohio, Mayor Dave Berger
Omaha, Neb., Mayor Jim Suttle
The EPA's fledgling IP3 is potentially a welcome answer to balancing the need to invest in progress toward clean water goals without over taxing low-, moderate- and fixed- income households. Thus, mayors are suggesting that EPA either revise the act or change the way it is being implemented. More suggestions are listed below:
Amending the Clean Water Act
Adjusting the EPA Regulatory Approach
Quotes from Participating Mayors
"As mayors, we don't have the luxury of focusing on only one issue," said Hallandale Beach, Fla., Mayor Joy Cooper, chair of the USCM Environmental Committee. "We have to look at the whole array of environmental needs and given our financial constraints, determine the best course of action that best protects the health of our citizens, our environment, and our economy."
"Cities have so many local challenges to meet including coming up with the most efficient and cost-effective ways to address local water and infrastructure needs as well as unfunded mandates," said Chicopee, Mass., Mayor Michael Bissonnette. "This is the perfect time to call for a 'time out', to pause, catch up on improvements and not add more of a financial burden on our ratepayers."
"Cities continue to shoulder an overwhelming responsibility of compliance," said Chattanooga, Tenn., Mayor Ron Littlefield. "I look forward to the day when federal regulations are administered on a regional basis. Forthcoming change has been discussed and promised for decades yet never implemented. This unequal enforcement encourages sprawl and unsustainable development on the perimeter of municipalities and contributes to numerous water quality problems without the offenders being held to the same standard of regulation. Something has got to change soon."
"The current situation facing communities is neither productive nor sustainable," said Lima, Ohio, Mayor Dave Berger. "Congressional action is absolutely necessary: Congress needs to either appropriate sufficient grant funding to meet the CWA obligations as they are being enforced by EPA, or pass amendments to the CWA which provide adequate relief and flexibility for communities facing unaffordable mandates."
"Omaha has asked the EPA to allow city's flexibility in achieving clean water standards," said Omaha, Neb., Mayor Jim Suttle. "We believe we could reduce the costs of our combined sewer overflow project by exploring new technologies and incorporating stronger green solutions."