Standing Up to a Stern Test

Oct. 3, 2005
Alabama storm water direct filtration facility withstands Hurricane Ivan

About the author: Nadia Abbott is a marketing manager for water purification solutions at Severn Trent Services. She can be reached at 215/997-3733 or by e-mail at [email protected].

A $300 million peak-flow treatment facility in Birmingham, Ala., that has been in operation since mid-2003, dramatically improved the wastewater quality in that community. In September 2004, the facility experienced its sternest test to date when Hurricane Ivan drenched the surrounding area with nearly 10 in. of rain. The facility passed the test thanks to deep-bed filter technology and innovative new methods for ensuring consistent water flow.

For many years, heavy rainfalls in Alabama’s largest city caused flow at the Village Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant to increase from a normal 30 mgd to more than 360 mgd. Any flow beyond approximately 80 mgd had to be bypassed to the Village Creek waterway, which feeds Bayview Lake.

To address the problem, a pilot filtration study was commissioned by the Environmental Services Department of Jefferson County, Ala., and by consulting engineers Gary L. Owen & Associates of Birmingham. A pilot filter plant containing two 10-ft2 filters, each housing a 5 ft depth of large, rounded sand filter media, was supplied by Severn Trent Services.

Pilot testing

Pilot testing of the deep-bed sand filtration took place in the summer of 2000. The pilot program lasted more than two months while a variety of flows, solids loadings and operating techniques were investigated. Operations focused on loading the pilot filters with about 100 mg/L total suspended solids wastewater at 10 gpm/ft2 of filtration area. This represented applied loading rates that were two to four times higher than previous experience and required developing new ways to maintain filter flow.

During testing, monthly average effluent limits were 30 mg/L total suspended solids and 25 mg/L Carbonaceous Biochemical Oxygen Demand (CBOD). The pilot plant consistently met these limits during repetitive testing. The best effluent and longest filter runs were achieved with no chemical addition.

Conventionally operated filters would have quickly plugged with such high influent flow and solids loadings. So during the pilot study, new methods of operating and backwashing were developed to keep the water moving.

One proprietary operating method, called SpeedBump, involved stopping effluent flow from the first filter, reversing the flow using the backwash pumps for a short period (about one minute), then proceeding immediately to the next filter while flow was restored to the first filter, and so on. Closing influent valves during this process was optional, depending on the initial water level in the filter.

This continuous process provided a surprisingly effective reduction in the back-up wastewater.

According to Dave Slack, general manager of Severn Trent Services’ office in Tampa, Fla., “Originally, our customer at Village Creek didn’t believe the SpeedBump process would be an important part of the operation.

“But after seeing the system in operation, the customer recognized its significance. It allowed water levels in the filters to drop below the overflow point for a period of 20 minutes to as much as two hours. The technique was key to achieving reasonable filter run times when handling high wastewater flows and heavy solids loadings.”

Further testing was done to simulate the “first flush” of the collection system in the first few hours of a major rain event. This led to the development of new backwashing methods to allow for continuous application of 200 to 500 mg/L total suspended solids undiluted raw wastewater to the filters at about 5 gpm/ft2. With this very high loading, filter run time was cut to about an hour, even with 20-minute interval speed bumping.

A short air-water backwash of only a few minutes was enough to expel most of the solids causing the backup and get the flow going again. This proprietary method, known as SpeedWash, has been automated in the large filter plant to proceed continuously, seamlessly and quickly from one filter to the next, completing the circuit in sufficient time to operate at elevated solids loading conditions.

The first flush treatment tests produced effluent quality of about 40 mg/L total suspended solids, below the projected weekly permit average of 45 mg/L.

Incorporating new systems

The new plant was put into operation in July 2003. With deep-bed sand filters, the system is capable of handling the base flow plus flow from a second new bio plant, which became operational in October 2004. The system also includes a 340-mgd pump station; 20 surge basins with a total capacity of 90 mg that can handle up to six hours of peak flow; a second new biological treatment plant; and ultraviolet (UV) disinfection.

The plant includes 22 deep bed filters, each with 1160 ft2 filtration surface area. The filters are laid out in two trains with room for expansion. The new control methods and innovative piping designs (a technology package referred to as StormMaster) allow continuous, rolling execution of up to two simultaneous air-water backwashes and four water-only backwashes at the same time, divided among the two filter trains to control head loss and expel excess solids during wet weather events. These events peak at up to 360 mgd for four hours, with elevated flows persisting for as much as 24 hours.

However, between storms the plant is successfully polishing 60 mgd of final effluent for discharge to Village Creek. A portion of the peak flow continues to be handled by the existing biological treatment plant. Dirty backwash water is sent to thickeners in the biological treatment plants.

Filter features

One key feature of the filters is the 6-ft-deep bed of large, rounded sand, which allows high flow rates, large storage capacity for heavy solids loadings and long run times. Self-flocculating mechanisms for solids lodged within the filter media reduce the need for chemical addition.

A second key feature is the filter underdrain. Rows of arched concrete blocks rest on the filter floor, leaving large passages for water to flow under and between rows. This design, called a T-block system, is extremely resistant to biological fouling, making it ideally suited for wastewater applications. The blocks also protect the backwash air-distribution system.

A third key feature is a system of stainless-steel backwash air laterals under alternate rows of T-blocks. The system precisely meters air under the entire bottom of the filter, allowing for even and effective backwashing. The design stands up well to heavy-duty conditions and provides zero maldistribution. Many plants have used this system for more than 20 years with no major maintenance or loss of media. “Simultaneous air-water backwashing provides far superior cleaning capability and much lower water consumption than separate air scouring and high-rate water washing,” said Slack. “This is important in a large, heavily loaded filter plant.

Backwash water consumption during rare peak flow operation is calculated to be about 10% of forward flow, but only 1 to 2% for normal operation. A field survey found that other filter types were averaging 11% of forward flow for backwash, even for normal operations. As a result, the Village Creek plant is benefiting from reduced recycle flows and treatment costs.”

Adjacent to the new filter plant are 24 surge basins that hold the first flush of undiluted wastewater with the highest concentration of pollutants for later processing. This water may be applied directly to the filters at the operator’s discretion.

The new biological treatment plant also takes in some of the surge flow directly. All wastewater treated by the facility also passes through the new filters.

Final effluent is treated by UV disinfection before discharge to Village Creek. UV disinfection is greatly enhanced when supplied with filtered water, resulting in improved kill effectiveness, reduced power draw and greatly lowered tube maintenance.

A significant test

On Sept.16, 2004, the plant received a significant test when Hurricane Ivan roared through the state. Ivan was still a tropical storm as it passed through Alabama’s Birmingham and Jefferson counties during the late afternoon and early evening. While peak wind gusts were significantly reduced by then to just 45-55 mph, the storm dumped nearly 10 in. of rain on the area.

Village Creek’s new facility handled the torrential rainfall as it was designed. Rain infiltration into the collection system caused flows to rise rapidly. A 182 mgd flow was applied to the filters, which they handled without difficulty. The SpeedBump cycle was utilized, reducing head loss in the filters as planned.

Later in November, the plant experienced three consecutive days of high flow ranging from 187 to 137 mgd.

“The effluent total suspended solids in each instance—during Hurricane Ivan and during the three consecutive days in November—ranged from one to no more than 12 ppm total suspended solids,” said Slack. “In some cases, the use of the patented SpeedBump feature lowered the cell level from 89% to 55%, establishing its credibility.”

The peak-flow facility in Birmingham, using deep-bed filter technology, has helped the Village Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant to not only improve wastewater quality, but has benefited the Village Creek waterway and Bayview Lake—even during a hurricane.

About the Author

Nadia Abbott

Sponsored Recommendations

Blower Package Integration

March 20, 2024
See how an integrated blower package can save you time, money, and energy, in a wastewater treatment system. With package integration, you have a completely integrated blower ...

Strut Comparison Chart

March 12, 2024
Conduit support systems are an integral part of construction infrastructure. Compare steel, aluminum and fiberglass strut support systems.

Energy Efficient System Design for WWTPs

Feb. 7, 2024
System splitting with adaptive control reduces electrical, maintenance, and initial investment costs.

Blower Isentropic Efficiency Explained

Feb. 7, 2024
Learn more about isentropic efficiency and specific performance as they relate to blowers.