Protection From Arsenic

Feb. 9, 2009

About the author: Rich Dennis is separation products manager for Severn Trent Services. Dennis can be reached at 813.886.9331 or by e-mail at [email protected].

On May 13, 2008, a public-private partnership in the city of Loma Linda, Calif., took the next step in an 11-year process to improve the local water system. That is when Lockheed Martin, one of the world’s leading aerospace companies, transferred to the city ownership and operations of an arsenic removal facility it had built.

The facility was designed and constructed in 2006 to remove naturally occurring arsenic levels in Loma Linda’s groundwater to meet stringent U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) arsenic level requirements of 10 ppb. Before construction, arsenic levels in two water system wells ranged from 18 to 22 ppb.

Since 1997, the city and Lockheed Martin have worked together to conduct ongoing water sampling, construct five new wells, supplement local water supplies and enhance the existing water system. These enhancements have included upgrading equipment and technology, developing new water connections with the cities of Redlands and San Bernardino, Calif., and installing treatment facilities such as the arsenic removal facility.

“Our goal is to provide Loma Linda with the safest water. Therefore, we knew this facility was a step forward in continuing to provide local residents with the highest quality of water,” said Brad Owens, director of environmental remediation for Lockheed Martin. “We are dedicated to our partnership with the city of Loma Linda and these improvements.

It’s something that is very important to us.”

Selecting an Arsenic Removal System

Earth Tech AECOM, a global provider of engineering, construction and operations services to the water and wastewater industry, was hired to select the most suitable arsenic treatment system. Pacific Hydratech, a company that provides construction services for the water and oil refining industries, served as the project’s general contractor.

Earth Tech AECOM evaluated a number of arsenic removal technologies and eliminated many of them from consideration due to lack of demonstrated ability to meet the target arsenic removal. These technologies included microfiltration, ultrafiltration, nanofiltration, permeable reactive barriers, electrokinetic, phytoremediation and biological treatment. Reverse osmosis and electrodialysis reversal were rejected based on high cost and complications associated with residuals disposal. The precipitative processes were also eliminated from further consideration because of multiple chemical requirements, significant volumes of sludge processing and skilled operator attention needed for proper operation.

After the initial screening, ion exchange and adsorptive processes were selected for detailed evaluation. Two systems—one each from the ion exchange and adsorptive processes—were established as preferred systems, and proposals were requested for each technology. In the end, the SORB 33 arsenic removal technology and Bayoxide E33 arsenic removal media were selected for the project.

Severn Trent Services developed the SORB 33 process to reduce arsenic contamination across a range of water treatment application sizes, and the technology has been commercially proven to effectively and economically meet EPA standards for maximum arsenic contaminant levels. Bayoxide E33 is a dry, robust, granular ferric oxide media designed with a high capacity for arsenic, providing long operating cycles and low operating costs.

The city of Loma Linda SORB system is designed to treat up to 3,000 gal per minute, making it one of the largest such systems in California. The system serves 21,000 residents and businesses. It consists of four carbon steel pressure adsorbers, piping, instrumentation controls and the Bayoxide E33 adsorption media. The well water is fed in parallel downward flow, generally through three of the four vessels containing the media. The fourth vessel is maintained in standby. The system includes a pH adjustment unit that feeds CO2 into the feedwater to reduce pH to about 8.0. The system also has a bypass control loop to flow up to 25% of the well water flow around the pH adjustment and arsenic removal adsorbers, subsequently to be blended with the treated water.

Pressure differential through each vessel is measured and used to determine when it is necessary to backwash, or “fluff,” the media. It has been found that backwashing and resting the beds periodically extends media life. Periodically, each adsorber is taken offline for backwashing to remove media fines that have built up and to fluff up the compacted bed, and then rested for a few days. The backwash water is decanted and later mixed with the plant influent water.

Aside from backwashing, there are no other steps required until the end of the adsorbent’s capacity when it becomes exhausted.

Meeting Expectations

According to Steve Wood, Severn Trent Services’ arsenic regional sales manager, the SORB system has operated as expected, reducing arsenic levels to less than the maximum contaminant level of 10 ppb.

“The Loma Linda/Lockheed Martin partnership was very deliberate in their approach to solving the arsenic problem in Loma Linda,” Wood said. “Over the past 11 years, the partnership has constructed one of the most robust water treatment systems I’ve seen.”

“Our partnership with Lockheed Martin has led to great improvements to our water infrastructure and improved water quality for our residents now and into the future,” said Jarb Thaipejr, public works director for the city of Loma Linda.

Download: Here

About the Author

Rich Dennis

Sponsored Recommendations

Blower Package Integration

March 20, 2024
See how an integrated blower package can save you time, money, and energy, in a wastewater treatment system. With package integration, you have a completely integrated blower ...

Strut Comparison Chart

March 12, 2024
Conduit support systems are an integral part of construction infrastructure. Compare steel, aluminum and fiberglass strut support systems.

Energy Efficient System Design for WWTPs

Feb. 7, 2024
System splitting with adaptive control reduces electrical, maintenance, and initial investment costs.

Blower Isentropic Efficiency Explained

Feb. 7, 2024
Learn more about isentropic efficiency and specific performance as they relate to blowers.