Supreme Court Settles South Carolina Sewer Debate

July 26, 2006

The South Carolina Supreme Court ruled that Oconee County must abide by a 1976 voter-approved referendum that limits funding for sewers, as well as limiting the users’ fees, federal and state grants, and bonds payable from revenues produced from the operation of a wastewater plant.

In 2004, Susie Cornelius, a resident of Mountain Rest, S.C., pointed out that the county’s master plan for infrastructure development along Interstate 85 was to be paid for using property tax dollars. The plan violated the 1976 referendum, and thus the case was sent to the Supreme Court.

The ruling found in favor of Cornelius, who is running for the South Carolina House District 1 seat. The court also ordered the county to pay up to $9,450 of Cornelius’ legal fees.

The Supreme Court pointed out that the referendum does not prevent the county from contracting with other public or private entities to provide sewer services. According to Anderson Independent MailOconee County has $609,000 in the budget to go to the cities that are to be the main users of any wastewater treatment plant. The money can be given to operate sewer plants, providing that the county does not become directly involved.

Source: Anderson Indpendent Mail

Sponsored Recommendations

Blower Package Integration

March 20, 2024
See how an integrated blower package can save you time, money, and energy, in a wastewater treatment system. With package integration, you have a completely integrated blower ...

Strut Comparison Chart

March 12, 2024
Conduit support systems are an integral part of construction infrastructure. Compare steel, aluminum and fiberglass strut support systems.

Energy Efficient System Design for WWTPs

Feb. 7, 2024
System splitting with adaptive control reduces electrical, maintenance, and initial investment costs.

Blower Isentropic Efficiency Explained

Feb. 7, 2024
Learn more about isentropic efficiency and specific performance as they relate to blowers.