Global Water Intelligence has announced the theme for the 11th Annual Global Water Summit. “Intelligent Synergies” will be the focal point of...
Reducing the overall long-term costs of flood control pumping stations
The pointers given below are used by Grundfos staff when analyzing the requirements of new pumping stations. Although useful, they are generalized recommendations only and cannot replace individual, job-specific advice. This article will review the general considerations required when designing a flood control pumping station, followed by more specific design examples.
Considerations When Designing Pump Stations
Carefully going through all of these steps will create an effective foundation for success and will help keep overall costs to a minimum:
Choosing a Pump
Generally speaking, propeller pumps are recommended for low-head applications, and mixed-flow pumps are ideal for medium-head applications. Installing submersible pumps in columns can have substantial advantages over other pump types—for example, when long-shaft turbine pumps are used in flood control applications.
These advantages include:
The best choice of installation often is the one that offers scope for lower construction costs. The flexibility of column-type installation allows for everything from free outflow (above or below water level) to pressurized solutions. Column-type installations also can be inclined.
The sump design has a crucial impact on the pump’s total lifespan. A less-than-optimal sump design potentially could result in poor performance and/or mechanical strain due to vibrations and cavitation at the inlet to the pump(s). A poor design can lead to sedimentation of sand and rags, which in turn can cause additional cavitation and vibration problems.
The main design requirement for a sump design is to provide optimal inlet conditions for the pumps. The flow being delivered to the pump units should be uniform, steady and free of swirls or entrained air.
Column-installed pumps are high volume, making them sensitive to suction chamber conditions; great care must be taken to ensure safe and long-lasting operation. The dividing walls—and the positioning of the pumps—must be conducted in a manner that avoids surface vortices, air ingestion and entrainment, and turbulence.
The following factors should be considered:
Beating cavitation. Cavitation—and the noise and vibrations associated with this process—can be prevented by fitting an anti-cavitation cone below the pump. When installed just beneath the suction bowl, the cone prevents cavitation and can also prevent vortices and fluid separation.
Fasten all chains and cables. Having chosen a tube installation, always make sure that chains and cables are securely fastened as they are placed in the flow of the pump. They must never be allowed to move with the flow. Loose chains or cables will be subject to wear and damage resulting in premature failure.
Screen design. When considering screen design, the dead zone should be kept as small as possible to minimize scraper travel. Screens should be divided into several vertical panels and supported by vertical piers; they should never be supported horizontally. Observing this rule maximizes the flow channel, thereby eliminating potential head increases and making it easy to clean and maintain the screens.
Handling sludge. During dry seasons, water levels recede. When this happens, the sludge in the remaining water settles in the sump. The situation can escalate by a slow inflow when additional sludge enters the sump and water evaporates. The end result may be that the impeller is buried in silt when the pump needs to start.
To keep the sump clean at all times, it is recommended to install a small sludge pump in a separate small pump sump within the main sump. This sludge pump is used to empty the main sump in periods with less or no inflow to the main sump.
Using Different Pump Sizes
The pumps used in flood control applications often are called upon to operate under normal weather conditions—not just in extreme flood situations. At the same time, the pumping station must be able to cope with much higher peak flows in flood situations. Finding the balance can be difficult because the final pumping station design may end up being quite unsuited for the two different scenarios. To overcome this challenge, the sump can be divided into two chambers—one for normal operation and another for peak flow situations. The two chambers of the sump must be divided by a low wall that allows the water to flow over it into the second sump in flood situations. The pumps used for normal operation should be relatively small, operating in cascade or by means of frequency converter, whereas the peak flow pumps should be quite big, enabling them to cope with the extreme situation.
Flood control pumps are big investments, and service and repair are relatively costly. Even when the system is designed well and the pumps used are of high quality, wear is inevitable—as is the risk of failure. Monitoring the condition of pumps helps lower the total life-cycle cost of the flood control application. Proper monitoring and control will:
Sensors Help Alleviate Main Risks
When pumps are submerged, there is a greater risk of water entering the motor through the cable gland and shaft seal. For that reason, most manufacturers incorporate an oil chamber with double sealing and also fit a range of sensors to protect the pumps—often far more than in smaller pumps. Typical sensors in large pumps include:
In addition to the above pump sensor, most applications also have a sensor to keep an eye on power consumption, voltage, operating hours, etc. Typically, keeping an eye on changes in values is more important than responding to absolute value. During the commissioning stage, it often will be beneficial to experiment with different reference values to ascertain when action may be required.
A lot of know-how and experience is available from the pump supplier, which can provide value to the design of future pumping stations for flood control.