Emergency surgery

Nov. 13, 2002
undefined

Fate pulled Bob Rusch from the audience.

The Oklahoma Department of Transportation bridge division engineer was attending a conference with his fellow peers in Atlantic City, and one of the sessions he sat in on was how the city of Birmingham, Ala., handled a span collapse. Less than a week later, a barge crashed into the I-40 bridge in Oklahoma during the early morning of May 26. Rusch was now an active participant in a disastrous discussion.

"I was asleep when it happened," he told Roads & Bridges. "I was surprised it was that particular bridge because in my mind that was the best of our navigation spanning structures. I never had any concerns about that bridge."

Rusch and several other ODOT officials were flown to the nearest airport and driven to the site where one devastating hit tore limbs from the I-40 bridge and ruthlessly ripped families apart. Fourteen people died, two piers were destroyed and a third was in critical condition. The state's money route--in terms of moving commerce--had hit rock bottom.

"We have to be prepared to react to eventualities like this," said Rusch. "It's part of the job. It's not a pleasant part, but it's something we have to do to be able to serve the traveling public."

Over the course of the next 11/2 months, reaction was unique, strong and efficient.

By the hour

When responding to an emergency, one has to drive fast and keep a cool head. ODOT knew this, and within days went against customary procedures and held a rare pre-bid meeting (June 8) for potential bidders at the bridge site without a complete set of construction plans. Many of the contractors helped with initial clean-up efforts, so they were familiar with the scene. Still, ODOT wanted to exercise every precautionary measure.

"We wanted to make sure we were getting all the relevant questions that needed to be fielded," said Rusch. "A lot of questions were in relation with part of the structural steel span (span four) that was remaining to be replaced. At that time, the span was still hanging in the river, and they wanted to know exactly how much was going to be left when they got their hands on it."

Normally, a transportation commission meets monthly to award contracts. The contractor then has 10 days to execute the contract and return it to ODOT. Another 14 days pass before ODOT sends the contract back to the contractor, and a work order is issued two weeks later. With the I-40 bridge, bids were read on June 12 at 11 a.m., an emergency commission meeting took place at 2 p.m. to award the contract, the contract was signed at 4 p.m. and a work order was effective at 6 p.m.

The A+B contract was drawn up by the hour instead of the day. ODOT allowed a maximum B bid of 1,728 hours. Gilbert Central Corp., Ft. Worth, Texas, the eventual winner of the job, came in at 1,368 hours. An incentive/disincentive value of $6,000 an hour was assigned. The sum was based on user costs--originally calculated in excess of $230,000 a day--for detoured traffic. Eastbound I-40 traffic faced a crippling 57-mile detour route using State Highway 2, State Highway 9 and U.S. 59. ODOT later conducted traffic counts on the detour routes to determine the effect on local traffic and the diverted I-40 motorists and revised the $230,000 daily user costs to $430,000.

Before Gilbert Central won the job there was a three-day scramble to get a hold of suppliers and subcontractors to complete the bid process. ODOT turned to its website to post any project revisions, and it was up to the contractor to make the adjustments and apply them to its bid.

Gilbert Central's networking capability was a huge advantage after it was awarded the job. The company is a unit of Peter Kiewit Sons' Inc., Omaha, Neb., which has more than 30 district and area offices in the U.S. and Canada.

"Just getting the resources there was a big deal," Jim Poe, Gilbert Central's assistant project manager for the I-40 bridge, told Roads & Bridges. "We had to have enough maintenance people to get the cranes going, and equipment and materials were coming into the job from across the country."

Built with speed

While Gilbert Central called on some friends, ODOT hooked up with the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) and the Texas Department of Transportation for any kind of tips on how to handle such a disaster. Caltrans, with its earthquake experience, actually sent a crew to the site.

Underwater inspections were conducted to check the standing piers east of the wreckage, and an actual wrecking ball was used to remove the part of the steel span (span four) that slumped into the water. A crane with sheers was used first, but it was difficult to manipulate so the decision was made to go with the wrecking ball. Caltrans marked off exactly how much needed to be removed--125 ft--and workers actually stood on the span to closely monitor the demolition. Excess steel was cut with a torch. Concrete barrier walls were used as counterweight during removal. When span four went down it created a full load on span five, and the counterweight prevented another collapse.

A barge-mounted A-frame with cable winches pulled chunks of damaged concrete to the surface, and Gilbert Central soon moved in with truck loads of rock fill. The fill--60,000 tons of it--was used to build an access road into the river so crews could reconstruct piers two and three on a dry surface rather than water.

"It allowed us to build quicker," said Poe.

Quick thinking came into play with substructure reconstruction. Casings for 9-ft-diam. drilled shafts had to be fabricated for the job. Instead of waiting, Gilbert Central ordered 12-ft-diam. casings from New York for the first three drilled shafts before the custom-made versions arrived. The 60-ft-deep drilled shafts were placed 27 ft into solid rock.

Column design took a different turn to what was originally constructed. To accelerate erection, it was decided to leave some of the existing substructure in the water. To build around the foundations, the traditional two-column design was scratched for a three-column alternative. Longer spans also helped.

A concrete plant was located just two miles from the site, and Gilbert Central opted for a high-early strength concrete, where more cement is used in the mix. To quickly determine when the new concrete reached the required strength workers used the intelliRock maturity system, (Circle 926) developed by Nomadics Construction Labs, Stillwater, Okla. At the same time concrete was placed in the formwork, one or more intelliRock maturity loggers were placed in the structure. The loggers processed the time-temperature history of the structure and stored the resulting maturity history of the concrete at the specific location of the logger. The corresponding strength of the structure was determined at any time from the maturity data provided by the logger in conjunction with previously determined strength-maturity relationship data. On average, the cure time was less than 24 hours.

Pier construction consisted of the drilled shafts, a crash wall (10-ft-tall solid mass of concrete which lies on the three drilled shafts), the three circular columns, a cap and concrete beams. Steel beams were used when the bridge was first built, but the short time frame called for precast bulb tee BT72 concrete girders, 12 on each of spans one, two and three.

Gilbert Central executed single-deck pours on spans one, two and three. Span four, which consisted of separate eastbound and westbound spans, contained some of the trickiest of tasks. ODOT was able to save a portion of the original section by knocking out the 125 ft of hanging concrete and then flame straightening--both vertical and horizontal--mangled steel beams. Initially, one of the four steel girders did not sit right, but this problem was resolved with the weight of the concrete deck pour (there was one eastbound pour and one westbound pour).

When it came to connecting the new steel with the flame straightened steel on span four, Gilbert Central used an existing splice to tie the two together.

For deck connection prior to the two pours, dowel rebar was attached to the existing deck of span four. A 3/4-in. expansion joint was installed to allow the separate spans to react independently.

A modular expansion joint connected the concrete girders of span three to the new portion of span four.

The I-40 bridge was completely healed in less than 47 days, which earned Gilbert Central almost $1.5 million in hourly incentives.

Sponsored Recommendations

Blower Package Integration

March 20, 2024
See how an integrated blower package can save you time, money, and energy, in a wastewater treatment system. With package integration, you have a completely integrated blower ...

Strut Comparison Chart

March 12, 2024
Conduit support systems are an integral part of construction infrastructure. Compare steel, aluminum and fiberglass strut support systems.

Energy Efficient System Design for WWTPs

Feb. 7, 2024
System splitting with adaptive control reduces electrical, maintenance, and initial investment costs.

Blower Isentropic Efficiency Explained

Feb. 7, 2024
Learn more about isentropic efficiency and specific performance as they relate to blowers.